Goldenarticles articles

Ultralight backpacking versus conventional backpacking - al fresco


Contrary to what many think, ultralight backpacking is not just about the candor to hike more miles or to take your whole pack up the mountain with you. It is also about comfort and safety. Backpackers with heavy loads work too hard and threaten their joints too much. Challenges may add to the experience, but why endure more than is necessary?

The Disadvantages Of Customary Backpacking

Lack Of Freedom

You can't by a long shot take a side trip up that hill, just to see what is there. If you do it lacking your pack, you have to go back the same way to get your pack.

It's A Hassle

Putting on and captivating off your heavy pack cursorily becomes a chore. You start departure it on even for the duration of rest stops, just so you don't have to deal with it.

It's Tiring

Backpacking is obviously more exhausting with a heavy pack, and you doubtless won't enjoy manually as much when you are tired.

More Injuries

Sprained ankles, scorched feet, sore muscles, and back and knee harms are just some of the customary penalty of too much burden on your back.


More consequence equals slower progress, which means less contact to wild spaces (you can't go as far on your four-day trip), or it means less time to for enjoyable activities, like a swim in a mountain lake, or a relaxing late afternoon in camp.

More Dangerous

More injuries, and the incapacity to move cursorily when a storm is advent or an disaster requires you to get to a road, means that backpacking can in reality be more dodgy with a heavy load. Add to that the likelihood of bad decisions due to tiredness.

The Ultralight Backpacking Alternative

Done the right way, ultralight backpacking gives you more freedom, more comfort, more safety, more enjoyment and less agony than conventional backpacking. It allows you to move faster, but advertisement that I say "allows. " It doesn't demand it. It just gives you the option. That's more freedom.

I have yet to meet or hear about a being who has tried insubstantial backpacking for a while, and then gone back to a heavy load. I'm not adage it is for everyone. Bad ankles may demand heavy climbing boots, and bad practice may call for a big pack to convince them. But even a tourist who needs a bolster and big rectangular sleeping bag, can find these in lighter forms.

You just can't appreciate the sense of deliverance felt by a alter to ultralight backpacking, until you try it yourself. When I, with my eleven-pound pack, walk past overloaded backpackers struggling up steep trails, I remembered being in their place, and I know I am enjoying in my opinion more now.

Misconceptions About Ultralight Backpacking

Lighweight Backpacking Means Sacrifice

Not so. Bring your desired camera! A lighter load means you can stop to use it more easily. If you leave after the effects you don't need, and bring a lighter backpack, tent, and sleeping bag, you can more by a long shot bring that telephoto lense or at all is exceedingly crucial to you.

Lighweight Backpacking Is Less Safe

The opposite! Bring all the shelter items; a sleeping bag, first aid kit, shelter, water purification, etc. Just bring lighter versions. A light load makes you less apt to lose your consider and fall, or to if not injure yourself. It also means nearer answer to iffy situations.

A note about safety:

It is lagely a affair of data and experience. A skilled survivalist will all the time be safer backpacking with no shelter than a amateur with the best tent. Learn a diminutive about how to use you gear properly, or to read the sky for comimg storms, and you can go lighter and safer.

Lightweight Backpacking Is Less Comfortable

Is it less comfortable to have 18 pounds on your back than 50? Is it less comfortable to have an ultralight sleeping bag if it keeps you just as warm? I closed receiving blisters (totally) when I happening using administration shoes as a substitute of climbing boots. Cut the authority on your back by twenty-five pounds, and you can add back a heavier coat, if that is what you need to be comfortable.

Lightweight Backpacking Is Expensive

Ultralight sleeping bags are expensive. More or less the whole lot else desirable for ultralight backpacking can be found for the same price or cheaper than conventional gear. There are many sub-three-pound backpacks under a hundred dollars, for example.

Bottom Line:

Try it. The first time you are fifteen miles into the day, and you appreciate that you can by a long shot run up that hill-just to see what is there, you'll know you made the right decision.

Steve Gillman is a long-time backpacker, and advocate of going light. His counsel and stories can be found at The Ultralight Backpacking Site. (http://www. the-ultralight-site. com)


Outdoors Digest  Sherman Denison Herald Democrat

Sixth-graders fundraise for outdoor trips  Plumas County Newspapers

Montco recommends masking outdoors  The Philadelphia Inquirer

Developed by:
home | site map © 2021